Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 15 results ...

Daget, Y T and Zhang, H (2019) Decision-making model for the evaluation of industrialized housing systems in Ethiopia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 296–320.

Du, J, Jing, H, Castro-Lacouture, D and Sugumaran, V (2019) Multi-agent simulation for managing design changes in prefabricated construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 270–95.

Durdyev, S, Hosseini, M R, Martek, I, Ismail, S and Arashpour, M (2019) Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): a quantified model for Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 186–204.

Han, J, Rapoport, A and Fong, P S (2019) Incentive structures in multi-partner project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 49–65.

Hwang, B, Zhao, X and Lim, J (2019) Job satisfaction of project managers in green construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 205–26.

Liao, X, Lee, C Y and Chong, H (2019) Contractual practices between the consultant and employer in Chinese BIM-enabled construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 227–44.

Liu, S, Jin, H, Liu, C, Xie, B and Mills, A (2019) Government compensation and costs of non-competition guarantee for PPP rental retirement villages. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 128–49.

Mahamadu, A, Manu, P, Mahdjoubi, L, Booth, C, Aigbavboa, C and Abanda, F (2019) The importance of BIM capability assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 24–48.

Moohialdin, A S M, Lamari, F, Miska, M and Trigunarsyah, B (2019) Construction worker productivity in hot and humid weather conditions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 83–108.

Ozyurt, B, Dikmen, I and Birgonul, M T (2019) Clustering of host countries to facilitate learning between similar international construction markets. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 66–82.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Knowledge management; International construction; Strategic management; Questionnaire survey;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2018-0495
  • Abstract:
    In the global construction industry, experience gained in various countries is a major source of competitive advantage. By transferring the knowledge gained in previous projects using an effective knowledge management strategy, they can increase their competitiveness by adopting best practices and by not repeating the same mistakes under similar conditions. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how similar countries can be clustered to facilitate learning in global markets. Design/methodology/approach Initially, country factors that can affect success in international projects and can be used to assess the similarity of markets were identified by an extensive literature review and prioritised by a web-based questionnaire. A country evaluation form was prepared to collect country-specific data to be used in the cluster analysis of 39 countries where the Turkish contractors have been frequently working since the last 45 years. Cluster analysis was performed with SPSS 23.0. Findings Three country clusters were obtained and validated. Ultimately, how obtained country clusters may be used to facilitate learning from international construction projects was demonstrated by using an illustrative example. Research limitations/implications The findings depend on the experience and perspective of Turkish contractors doing business abroad. Thus, the identified clusters are not generic. Moreover, country clusters were not identified considering only the country factors such as economy, culture, politics, etc.; thus, countries in the same cluster do not necessarily represent “similar” countries in terms of macro-factors. Clusters were identified so that the lessons learned can be effectively transferred within the same cluster considering construction and project-related factors as well as country-related factors. Although the findings cannot be generalised and clusters are not static, it is believed that the methodology used in this research is repeatable for different countries considering different timeframes. Originality/value Theoretical contributions include the identification of factors that can be used for similarity assessment of countries for transferring lessons learned as well as a methodology for clustering. Findings may also have a practical value for the Turkish contractors.

Sang, L, Xia, D, Ni, G, Cui, Q, Wang, J and Wang, W (2019) Influence mechanism of job satisfaction and positive affect on knowledge sharing among project members. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 245–69.

Sarhan, J G, Xia, B, Fawzia, S, Karim, A, Olanipekun, A O and Coffey, V (2019) Framework for the implementation of lean construction strategies using the interpretive structural modelling (ISM) technique. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 1–23.

Sezer, A A and Bröchner, J (2019) Site managers’ ICT tools for monitoring resources in refurbishment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 109–27.

Wang, D, Fu, H and Fang, S (2019) The efficacy of trust for the governance of uncertainty and opportunism in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 150–67.

Wang, Y, Liu, J, Zuo, J and Rameezdeen, R (2019) Ways to improve the project management efficiency in a centralized public procurement system. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(01), 168–85.